Main Article Content

Abstract

Nutritional information on food packaging is information that consumers can use to choose healthy packaged food. Making it a habit to read labels, especially the nutritional value information printed on food packaging, needs to be done to make it easier for consumers to choose food according to their needs, especially regarding foods with ingredients that need to be limited, such as sugar, salt and fat. Purpose: This study aims to determine the habit of reading or using ING labels among adolescents and adults. Methods: The study design used was cross sectional with 84 respondents. Data was obtained through filling out online questionnaires and the Semi Quantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire (SQ-FFQ) independently. Data were analyzed univariately and bivariately with the Chi-Square test. Results: Respondents with the ability to read ING labels were classified as less likely 2.35 times to consume high levels of packaged sweetened
drinks compared to respondents who had the ability to read ING labels which were classified as sufficient. Respondents who have a habit of reading ING labels are less inclined to consume packaged sweetened drinks more than respondents who have a habit of reading ING labels are quite moderate

Keywords

Minuman manis kemasan Remaja Dewasa Makassar Label ING

Article Details

How to Cite
Ismi Irfiyanti Facjruddin, Eldrian Maikel Mosipate, & Sri Mutmainnah Yunus. (2022). Kebiasaan Membaca Label Ing Minuman Manis Kemasan Pada Remaja-Dewasa Di Makassar. Ghizai : Jurnal Gizi Dan Keluarga, 2(1), 25-33. Retrieved from https://journal.unimerz.com/index.php/ghizai/article/view/293

References

  1. Whitney E, Rady RS. Understanding nutrition, fourteenth edition. Canada: Cangage
  2. Learning. 2015.
  3. 2. European Commission. Fruit juices, sugar sweetened beverages and artificially
  4. sweetened beverages: consumption patterns and impact on overweight and obesity.
  5. Luxembourg: European Union. 2018.
  6. 3. Haughton CF, Waring ME, Wang M. Rosal M. Pbert L, Lemon SC. Home matters: adolescent drink more sugarsweetened beverages when available at home. J Pediatr.
  7. 2018; 202, pp 121–128. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.06.046.
  8. 4. Malik VS, Hu FB. Sugar-sweetened beverages and cardiometabolic health: an update
  9. of the evidence. Nutrients. 2019;11(1840):1–17.
  10. 5. Ahmad N, Zuki MAM, Azilah-Azahar N, Han-Khor B, Sakdiah-minhat H. Prevalence
  11. and factors associated with sugar-sweetened beverage intake among undergraduate students in a public university in Malaysia. Pak. J. Nutr. 2019.18 (4) :354-363.
  12. doi: 10.3923/ pjn.2019.354.363.
  13. 6. Gan WY, Mohamed SF, Law LS. Unhealthy lifestyle associated with higher intake of
  14. sugar-sweetened beverages among Malaysian school-aged adolescents. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(15):1–13. doi: 10.3390/ ijerph16152785.
  15. 7. Kemenkes RI. Riset Kesehatan Dasar. Jakarta: Badan Peneliti dan Pengembangan
  16. Kementerian Kesehatan RI; 2018
  17. 8. Pratiwi LI. Faktor-faktor yang berhubungan dengan konsumsi sugarsweetened beverages (SSBs) di SMA Islam PB Soedirman Jakarta Timur tahun 2019. Skripsi. Universitas Indonesia. 2019.
  18. 9. Kementrian Kesehatan RI. (2014). Pedoman gizi seimbang. Jakarta: Dirjen Bina Gizi
  19. dan KIA.
  20. 10. Guthrie JF, Fox JJ, Cleveland LE, Welsh S. (1995). Who uses nutrition labeling, and
  21. what effects does label use have on diet quality?. Journal of Nutrition Education, 27,
  22. 163 – 172.
  23. 11. BPOM RI. 2018. Peraturan Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan No.31 tentang Label
  24. pangan Olahan.
  25. 12. Kusuma, AN. 2013. Pengetahuan Label Kemasan Pangan. Malang : Gunung Samuderah.
  26. 13. Assifa, R R. 2012. Faktor-faktor yang berhubungan dengan perilaaku membaca label
  27. pangan pada siswa SMAN 68 Jakarta. Skripsi : Universitas Indonesia.
  28. 33
  29. 14. Adilin MAMH, Nor FAS, Aliff AMM, Fattin FCA, Syaswani ON. Nutritional labelling:
  30. awareness and its effects towards consumer behaviour in purchasing product.
  31. Journal Appl Environ Biol Sci. 2015;5(January):62–8.
  32. 15. Notoatmodjo, Soekidjo. (2003). Pendidikan dan Perilaku Kesehatan. Jakarta: PT.
  33. Rineka Cipta.
  34. 16. Brown JE. Nutrition through the life cycle. 4th edition. USA: Cangage Learning. 2011.
  35. 623 p.
  36. 17. Stok FM, Vet E, De Wit JBF, De Luszczynska A, Safron M RD. The proof is in the eating: subjective peer norms are associated with adolescents’ eating behaviour.
  37. 2014;18(16):1044–51.
  38. 18. Ahmad N, Zuki MAM, Azilah-Azahar N, Han-Khor B, Sakdiah-minhat H. Prevalence
  39. and factors associated with sugar-sweetened beverage intake among undergraduate students in a public university in Malaysia. Pak. J. Nutr. 2019.18 (4) :354-363.
  40. doi: 10.3923/ pjn.2019.354.363.
  41. 19. Department of Health Australia. Healthy bodies need healthy drinks resource package [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2021 Jan 13]. Available from: https://www1.health.
  42. gov.au/internet/publications/publishing. nsf/Content/sugar-drinks-toc
  43. 20. University H. How sweet is it? [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2021 Jan 13]. Available from:
  44. https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/ nutritionsource/healthydrinks/sugarydrinks/how-sweet-i
  45. 21. Pratiwi LI. Faktor-faktor yang berhubungan dengan konsumsi sugarsweetened beverages (SSBs) di SMA Islam PB Soedirman Jakarta Timur tahun 2019. Skripsi. Universitas Indonesia. 2019
  46. 22. Park S, Blanck HM, Sherry B, Brener N, O’Toole T. Factors associated with sugarsweetened beverage intake among United States High School students. J Nutr.
  47. 2012;142(2):306–12
  48. 23. Zahid A, Davey C, Reicks M. Beverage intake among children: associations with parent and home-related factors. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(8).

Most read articles by the same author(s)